So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 >>> overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be >>>> replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 >>>> overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important >>
Starc back in
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be >>>>> replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 >>>>> overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume >>>> that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important >>>
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be >>>>>> replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume >>>>> that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may >>> not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
snip
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Oh BTW seems you are wrong there was mention.
"Pattinson fires amid doubts about Starc's availability for first Test" https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/pattinson-fires-amid-doubts-about-starc-s-availability-for-first-test-20201206-p56kz8.html
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:16:52 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
snip
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Oh BTW seems you are wrong there was mention.
"Pattinson fires amid doubts about Starc's availability for first Test"
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/pattinson-fires-amid-doubts-about-starc-s-availability-for-first-test-20201206-p56kz8.html
I can't access it Chuck.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be >>>>>>> replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume >>>>>> that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may >>>> not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are >>> you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've heard suggested.
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie, Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there *must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one though. Can you name any?
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:16:52 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
snip
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Oh BTW seems you are wrong there was mention.
"Pattinson fires amid doubts about Starc's availability for first Test"
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/pattinson-fires-amid-doubts-about-starc-s-availability-for-first-test-20201206-p56kz8.html
I can't access it Chuck.
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume >>>>>>> that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>> doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may >>>>> not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant. >>>>>
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are >>>> you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns. >>> The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a >> bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've >> heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been >> Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie, >> Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
On 15/12/2020 9:53 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:16:52 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
snip
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>> doubt for T1.
Oh BTW seems you are wrong there was mention.
"Pattinson fires amid doubts about Starc's availability for first Test"
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/pattinson-fires-amid-doubts-about-starc-s-availability-for-first-test-20201206-p56kz8.html
I can't access it Chuck.
Doesn't matter the headline is there, it had been mention that he was in doubt for T1.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:00:09 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:53 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:16:52 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
snip
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>>> doubt for T1.
Oh BTW seems you are wrong there was mention.
"Pattinson fires amid doubts about Starc's availability for first Test" >>>> https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/pattinson-fires-amid-doubts-about-starc-s-availability-for-first-test-20201206-p56kz8.html
I can't access it Chuck.
Doesn't matter the headline is there, it had been mention that he was in
doubt for T1.
Not very strongly, *and* it's nine days old.
But take a point if you must.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume >>>>>>>> that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>>> doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may >>>>>> not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant. >>>>>>
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are >>>>> you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns. >>>> The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone >>>> Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to >>>> the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a >>> bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've >>> heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been >>> Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie, >>> Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there >>> *must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one >>> though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>>>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>>>> doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant. >>>>>>>
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns. >>>>> The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone >>>>> Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to >>>>> the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've >>>> heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there >>>> *must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one >>>> though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the >>>>>>>>>> squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in >>>>>>> doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant. >>>>>>>>
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land?
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if
needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns. >>>>>> The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone >>>>>> Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to >>>>>> the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From >>>>> within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there >>>>> *must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one >>>>> though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of position.
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind.
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant. >>>>>>>>>
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone >>>>>>> Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to >>>>>>> the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From >>>>>> within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one >>>>>> though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of
position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Why are you wanting this information btw?
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to >>>>>>>> the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From >>>>>>> within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can
recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of
position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my
time..".
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States
in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib.
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
On 15/12/2020 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From >>>>>>>> within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can >>>>>>>> recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of
position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my
time..".
Oh OK you wanted it limited to this now.
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many
generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States
in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib.
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
No I can't
Ok. The point is Chuck that it's
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting >> position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
OK it is paranoia on your part. Enough said
BOO NSV member under your desk
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
Steve Smith next
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:02:41 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side. >>>>>>>>>>
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From >>>>>>>>> within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can >>>>>>>>> recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of >>>>> position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my
time..".
Oh OK you wanted it limited to this now.
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many
generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States >>> in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib.
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
No I can't
Ok. The point is Chuck that it's
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting >>> position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
OK it is paranoia on your part. Enough said
BOO NSV member under your desk
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
Steve Smith next
Has batted 3-6,
ie the m-o, since his hilariously unwarranted selection as
a leggie.
"next"
alvey
On 15/12/2020 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:02:41 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad.
Starc back in
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can >>>>>>>>>> recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of >>>>>> position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my
time..".
Oh OK you wanted it limited to this now.
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many
generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States >>>> in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib.
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
No I can't
Ok. The point is Chuck that it's
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting
position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
OK it is paranoia on your part. Enough said
BOO NSV member under your desk
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
Steve Smith next
Has batted 3-6,
Not wrong poor bloke moved these unfriendly and probably average-denting batting position
ie the m-o, since his hilariously unwarranted selection as
a leggie.
3-51 in his first Test, not bad, By the Ashes he was selected as a batsman.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:09:29 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:02:41 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Starc back in
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH. >>>>>>>>>>
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can >>>>>>>>>>> recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of >>>>>>> position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my
time..".
Oh OK you wanted it limited to this now.
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many
generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States >>>>> in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib. >>>>>
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
No I can't
Ok. The point is Chuck that it's
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting
position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
OK it is paranoia on your part. Enough said
BOO NSV member under your desk
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
Steve Smith next
Has batted 3-6,
Not wrong poor bloke moved these unfriendly and probably average-denting
batting position
ie the m-o, since his hilariously unwarranted selection as
a leggie.
3-51 in his first Test, not bad, By the Ashes he was selected as a batsman.
So you don't actually have anyone.
btw... Latest reports suggest Wade may soon be joining the club of m-o bats shunted to open. It's a pity that he's not still playing for the Dics as that'd mean that there'd be one from every State. Except NSW of course.
alvey
On 16/12/2020 6:52 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:09:29 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 6:42 pm, alvey wrote:So you don't actually have anyone.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:02:41 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 1:33 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:41:13 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 12:29 pm, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:40:43 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:34 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:03:22 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 9:38 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:11:15 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
On 15/12/2020 8:58 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:47:35 +1100, Dechucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 15/12/2020 8:36 am, alvey wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:38:39 +1100, Dechucka wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Starc back in
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4
overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
Strike 1: Starc & Green were already in the squad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Repeat: Starc was never 'out'. There was no mention that he was ever in
doubt for T1.
Fine the point remains they feel that they don't need to replace a
front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm suggesting he is in a squad of 17 to give some flexibility if >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed. Hey maybe he'll open :-), probably couldn't do worse than Burns.
means they feel that they don't need to replace a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> front-line strike bowler like Abbott with another of his kind. Green may
not be fit, if he is fit Henriques in the 17 man squad is irrelevant.
Strike 2: The Portugese Man O' Ordinary doesn't bowl enough to be
classified as an allrounder.
OK a batsman who can roll his arm over as needed
The likely side already has Marnus, Head and possibly Green for that. Are
you suggesting that Henriques in the top 6 batters in the land? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
The obvious advantage of that is one less Q'lander in the Test side.
I can't see Henriques being in the Test side, you asked " Could Someone
Please Explain?" and I have given my best explanation without going to
the hassle of a mind-meld with the selectors
Your "best explanation" makes as much sense as the inclusion of MH.
If you don't like my explanation come up with your own.
You asked a question, I gave an answer you argued
Striiiikkke 3.
Here's another one for you Chuck... With our openers falling like pins in a
bowling alley there's been much chat about who's going to do it. From
within the current team LooseBusChange & Paine are the only two names I've
heard suggested.
I suggest Henriques so tou're wrong again
This got me thinking (gasp!), *all* the Test players I can >>>>>>>>>>>> recall during my time who have batted out of their usual position have been
Others. Oto that'd be, Watto, Tom Moody, Wayne Phillips (SA), Greg Ritchie,
Boonie & Greg Blewett.
Given the huge numbers of Poos who have been handed a BG in my time there
*must* be some who have been shuffled. Forked if I can think of even one
though. Can you name any?
Yes
Well then?
Well then WHAT? Again you asked a question and I answered it
Boring Chuck.
So, Please name the NSW Test players who have regularly batted out of >>>>>>>> position.
Not sure about a list but Syd Gregory comes to mind.
Comprehension Chuck: "*all* the Test players I can recall during my >>>>>> time..".
Oh OK you wanted it limited to this now.
Aside from that, Syd Gregory's last Test was in 1909, not only many >>>>>> generations before I popped out, but also when there were only 2.5 States
in the Shield.
So when you said "Yes" [I can name someone] that was actually a fib. >>>>>>
Why are you wanting this information btw?
Really? Can you really not see the point?
No I can't
Ok. The point is Chuck that it's
harder to shift a Poo to an unfriendly and probably average-denting batting
position i.e. opening, than it is to get Trump to admit defeat.
OK it is paranoia on your part. Enough said
BOO NSV member under your desk
So you can't name a single Poo then. Goodo.
Steve Smith next
Has batted 3-6,
Not wrong poor bloke moved these unfriendly and probably average-denting >>> batting position
ie the m-o, since his hilariously unwarranted selection as
a leggie.
3-51 in his first Test, not bad, By the Ashes he was selected as a batsman. >>
Poor Smith swapped around and moved into moved these unfriendly and
probably average-denting batting positions. I'm really not interested in feeding your paranoia.
More, much more, a case of you being unable to HANDLE THE TRUTH Chuck...
snip
More, much more, a case of you being unable to HANDLE THE TRUTH Chuck...
Thank-you Thank-you Alvey for opening my eyes to the huge NSV conspiracy
in Australian cricket, I've seen the light and had an episiotomy (should have had an epiphany much less painful).
Now Alvey you go and have a cup of tea, a Bex and a good lie down while adjusting your tin-foil hat
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:00:58 +1100, Dechucka wrote:
snip
More, much more, a case of you being unable to HANDLE THE TRUTH Chuck...
Thank-you Thank-you Alvey for opening my eyes to the huge NSV conspiracy
in Australian cricket, I've seen the light and had an episiotomy (should
have had an epiphany much less painful).
Now Alvey you go and have a cup of tea, a Bex and a good lie down while
adjusting your tin-foil hat
Yep, this is all you have Chuck. Tired cliches.
Bex was banned in the
1970's,
which is where you still are...--- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 overs a game in the Shield. Eh?NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 8:38:49 PM UTC, dech...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to be >>> replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 >>> overs a game in the Shield. Eh?NSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
..the meaning of this strange behaviour, Duran Duran c1985?
why not mitchel marsh? is he still quarantined in dubai, or has he
been punching walls again? he played vs england in september.
his test figures arnt great but surely hes a giant compared to moses.
On Monday, December 14, 2020 at 8:38:49 PM UTC, dech...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 15/12/2020 7:26 am, alvey wrote:
So when the undeserving Abbott, allegedly a frontline bowler, has to beNSP (New South Portugal) conspiracy? They are desperate for an
replaced in the Test squad, he's replaced by someone who averages about 4 >>> overs a game in the Shield. Eh?
all-rounder in the side so are looking at Henriques or Green. I assume
that with Starc back they feel their front-line bowler stocks in the
squad are OK, as are their NSV stocks, so an all-rounder is more important
..the meaning of this strange behaviour, Duran Duran c1985?
why not mitchel marsh? is he still quarantined in dubai, or has he
been punching walls again? he played vs england in september.
his test figures arnt great but surely hes a giant compared to moses.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 7 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 32:06:07 |
| Calls: | 158 |
| Files: | 754 |
| Messages: | 89,947 |