I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least some
form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughout
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least some
form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughout
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least some
form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughout
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
In message <0905tfte19lefn7f8hgtr3pf7vdnujr77v@4ax.com>, Mike Holmans ><spam@jackalope.uk> writes
I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least someI've just looked at the scorecard and you're wrong:
form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughout
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO48798
Vince scored 67, but his team lost. Conversely, Will Jacks made a duck, >wasn't entrusted with a single over, but his team won. They seem to have >been the only two Brits involved.
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:37:32 +0000, John Hall
<john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <0905tfte19lefn7f8hgtr3pf7vdnujr77v@4ax.com>, Mike Holmans >><spam@jackalope.uk> writes
I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least some >>>form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughoutI've just looked at the scorecard and you're wrong:
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO48798
Vince scored 67, but his team lost. Conversely, Will Jacks made a duck, >>wasn't entrusted with a single over, but his team won. They seem to have >>been the only two Brits involved.
Yes, I was watching. But since I've already acknowledged that Vince is
not one (pretty obviously because he's English), I'm not sure how what
you say is helpful in determining which of the players on show were
from NSW. Since it appears I'm going to have to watch most of the BBL
to placate my US friends, I want to know which of the players I don't
much care about are over-rated by definition so that I can ignore the >commontariat's hyping of them.
I presume that an Australian playing for a Sinny team is at least some
form of honorary Poo, but that actual Poos are scattered throughout
the squads. Is this in fact the case, and if so, who were the actual
Poos in the HHvSS game? I'm pretty certain James Vince isn't one.
Cheers,
Mike
In message <eke5tfh471dkam71n...@4ax.com>, Mike Holmans
<sp...@jackalope.uk> writes
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:37:32 +0000, John Hall
Ah, I'd assumed that "Poo" must be a term of abuse that Australians use
for Poms, not having been closely following the inter-state warfare that seems to be endemic in Australian cricket.
Sysop: | Nitro |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, OR |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 32:05:42 |
Calls: | 158 |
Files: | 754 |
Messages: | 89,947 |